Historical images All come from Wikimedia Commons. We use the thumbnails provided by Commons, unedited. Portrait of Jakob Bernoulli, painted in 1687 by his brother Niklaus Bernoulli: source page · public domain. Title page of the Ars conjectandi, Basel, 1713: source page · public domain. Jakob Bernoulli’s tombstone in the cloister of Basel Minster, photo by Wladyslaw Sojka: source page · Free Art License. Cross-section of a nautilus shell, photo by Florian Elias Rieser: source page · CC BY-SA 4.0. Blog figures The cover, the drawing of the two spirals and the graph of the proportion of heads in simulated coin tosses are original illustrations, with versions in each of the site’s languages. The table of notations for the integral, in the post on the legacy, was redone from a table in this site’s old calculus course.
The calculus war Leibniz published calculus in 1684 and 1686. Newton had reached the same ideas in 1665–1666 but kept everything in manuscripts. For fifteen years nobody disputed anything. In 1699 the Swiss mathematician Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, a friend of Newton, hinted in a book that Leibniz had drawn on Newton. In 1708 the Scot John Keill went further and accused Leibniz of plagiarism. The argument: in 1676 Leibniz had visited London and seen a copy of Newton’s De analysi.
Newton was the greatest genius who ever lived, and the most fortunate, for there is only one universe to discover, and it can be discovered only once. — Joseph-Louis Lagrange, as reported by his contemporaries The calculus war Newton created the method of fluxions in 1665–1666 but did not publish it. Leibniz reached calculus independently in 1675 and published in 1684. For some years nobody quarrelled. In 1676 the two even exchanged cordial letters through Henry Oldenburg, and Newton hid his ideas in an anagram.
On 29 October 1675, in Paris, Leibniz was adding up infinitely many thin slices under a curve and got tired of writing omnia, “all”, in front of each sum. He noted in his notebook: Utile erit scribi ∫ pro omnia. (It will be useful to write ∫ instead of “all”.) — Leibniz, manuscript of 29 October 1675 The $\int$ is a stretched S, for summa. Two weeks later, in the same notebook, the $d$ appeared, for differentia, to denote infinitely small differences. With these two signs Leibniz had in his hands a language for the whole of calculus. Isaac Newton had reached the same ideas ten years earlier, in Cambridge, but wrote them differently. This is history’s best case for seeing how the shape of a sign changes what can be done with it.